Skip to content
Browse articles

Our Present Agni-Purana

By Rajendra Chandra Hazra

Vol. 12 · No. 4December - 1936pp. 683–691English

Summary

This paper analyses the present version of the Agni Purana and argues that it differs significantly from the Agni Purana described in the Matsya and Skanda Puranas. The earlier Puranas state that the work narrated incidents of the Idina Kalpa and was spoken by Agni to Vasistha, but in the current text Agni speaks to Vasistha without any mention of the Idina Kalpa; instead, the Varaha Kalpa is discussed. The author notes that verses quoted in Smriti treatises identify Vasistha and King Ambarisa as interlocutors and that several passages in the present text contain vocative forms like ‘rajan’ and ‘nrpa’, indicating that a king was originally addressed. These differences suggest that the extant Agni Purana is not the same as the original. The paper provides further evidence by comparing passages cited in the Tirtha‑cintamani and other Nibandhas with chapters of the present Agni Purana, finding that many verses are retained but the narrative framework has been altered to remove the interlocution between Vasistha and King Ambarisa. The author argues that the current text is a later recast which retained fragments of the older Purana and incorporated interpolated chapters. He identifies chapters 21‑108, 263‑272 and 317‑328 as probable later additions. The paper also discusses the classification of knowledge in chapter 1 of the Agni Purana, which divides vidya into para and apara branches but omits the Pancharatra Samhitas, an omission explained by the text’s later compilation. Overall, the study concludes that scholars should treat the present Agni Purana as an apocryphal work that underwent significant redaction.

AI-generated summary, automatically checked against the article text.

Conclusion

The author concludes that the extant Agni Purana is not the original Agneya Purana but a later redaction. Textual comparisons reveal that the ancient interlocution and thematic focus have been replaced, and interpolated chapters have been added. Recognising its composite nature is essential for scholars using the work as a source for religious or historical studies.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “The present Agni Purapa, though an apocryphal and compara- tively late work, does not seem to have come down 80 us quite unadulterated.”

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Rajendra Chandra Hazra

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

The Professional Jesters of the Vedic Age

By Rajendra Chandra Hazra

June & Sept. 1962
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Did Harita know the Tantras?

By Rajendra Chandra Hazra

June & September 1960
The Indian Historical Quarterly

A Newly Discovered Work of Bhatta Bhavadeva of Bengal

By Rajendra Chandra Hazra

March - 1956
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Is the Devi-bhagavata the Source of the Deogarh Relief of Nara-Narayana?

By Rajendra Chandra Hazra

December - 1953