Skip to content
Browse articles

Kingship and Nobility in the 14th Century (1284–1335)

By Anil Chandra Banerjee

Vol. 11 · No. 4December - 1935pp. 686–698English

Summary

The article continues the author's study of kingship and nobility in medieval India, focusing on the period between 1284 and 1335 during the Khalji dynasty. Jalal‑ud‑din's accession is portrayed as facilitated by the nobility's support after years of weak rulers. The author explores how Jalal‑ud‑din sought to placate nobles but his leniency allowed conspiracies that led to his assassination. Under Ala‑ud‑din Khalji, the monarchy asserted unprecedented control over the nobility through harsh measures such as property confiscations, restrictions on social gatherings, and a network of spies. These policies were designed to prevent rebellion and centralise authority, enabling successful campaigns against Gujarat, Malwa, and the Deccan. The article examines the impact of these measures on imperial stability and argues that while they strengthened the state, they also bred resentment that contributed to instability after Ala‑ud‑din's death. The paper closes by discussing the brief reigns of Jalal‑ud‑din's successors and the eventual overthrow of the Khalji dynasty.

AI-generated summary, automatically checked against the article text.

Conclusion

Through a close reading of sources, the article shows how the 14th‑century Delhi Sultanate oscillated between conciliating and constraining the nobility. Jalal‑ud‑din initially relied on aristocratic support, but his indulgence proved fatal, while Ala‑ud‑din's stringent regulations curtailed noble power and allowed imperial consolidation. Yet these measures sowed seeds of unrest that resurfaced after his death, highlighting the delicate balance between monarchical authority and noble autonomy in medieval Indo‑Islamic polity.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “T remarked that Jalil-ud-din Khaljl came 10 the throne of Delhi by the greatest of all rights—the right of conquest.”
  • “The nobles, not very loyal to the memory of their pure Turkish rulers, were evidently prepared 10 accept an accomplished fact, and anxious to fortify their own position by identifying themselves with the regime of the ત facto ruler.”
  • “Jalal-ud-din’s quality of mercy finally cost him his throne as well ag 48 life.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Wolseley Haig {(Cambridge History of India, vol. II, p. 91)
  2. K. K. Basu, Tarikh-i-Mubamkshahi, vol. 1, p. 287
  3. Firishta (Briggs, vol. 1, p. 287)
  4. Elliot and Dowson, vol. 141, pp. 140-41

Discussed in this article

People

Places

Texts & works

  • Tarikh-i-Mubamkshahi

Dynasties, sects & groups

  • Khaljis
  • Parwiris

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Anil Chandra Banerjee

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Expansion of the Rathor State in Marwar

By Anil Chandra Banerjee

June 1952
The Indian Historical Quarterly

The Vinaya Texts in Chinese

By Anil Chandra Banerjee

June - 1949
The Indian Historical Quarterly

A New History of the Indian People: Vol. VI—The Gupta-Vakataka Age (Review)

By Anil Chandra Banerjee

September - 1946
The Indian Historical Quarterly

The Subsidiary System in Marwar (1803-1843)

By Anil Chandra Banerjee

September - 1946

Continue reading

Related articles

The Indian Historical Quarterly

Kingship and Nobility in the Fourteenth Century

By Anil Chandra Banerjee

September - 1936