The Hindu Theatre
Summary withheld
An automated check found that the earlier summary of this article may not match its text, so it is hidden while it is rewritten. Please read the original PDF below.
An automated check found that the earlier summary of this article may not match its text, so it is hidden while it is rewritten. Please read the original PDF below.
Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.
“Mr. Mankad considers the Rangapitha (Rp.) and the Rangasirsa (R$.) ૩૩ two different parts of the theatre, We may think that the following facts will go against such 0 view:”
“From the points mentioned above it 13 perhaps clear that the terms Rp. and પ. ure synonymmous and as such relate to the same purt of the theatre and not to twe different parts ઘડ Mr. Mankad 1૩3 supposed.”
“The curluin mentioned by Damodara રાઈ ઘ host of drwmatists did not exist as Mr. Mankud has supposed (JH@Q., 1902. પ. 194-405) belween 185. 0 40]. but between the stage (पा. or પેડ.) and the tiving room (Neputhya-giTie).”
People
Texts & works
Dynasties, sects & groups
AI guide
Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.
Article order
Inline viewer
Checking source PDF
The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.
Same author
The Indian Historical Quarterly
Vol. 35 · No. 4
The Indian Historical Quarterly
Vol. 31 · No. 4
The Indian Historical Quarterly
Vol. 31 · No. 3
Continue reading
The Indian Historical Quarterly
Vol. 9 · No. 4
By V. Raghavan
The Indian Historical Quarterly
Vol. 8 · No. 3
By D. R. Mankad