Skip to content
Browse articles

The Architecture of the Taj and its Architect

By Shyam Chand Mukherjee

Vol. 9 · No. 4December - 1933pp. 872–879English

Summary

This article revisits the controversy over the design and authorship of the Taj Mahal. While some 19th-century writers speculated that the mausoleum was designed by an Italian architect—citing references to a “Geronimo Veroneo” or other Europeans—the author argues that the Taj Mahal’s architecture is firmly rooted in Indo-Islamic tradition. He systematically examines the monument’s plan, structural features, ornamentation and inscriptions to demonstrate that it evolved organically from previous Mughal buildings like Humayun’s Tomb, Akbar’s tomb at Sikandra and Itmad-ud-daula’s mausoleum. The article emphasises the harmonious proportions of the central dome, the symmetrical placement of the four minarets and the pietra dura inlay work with floral motifs reminiscent of Persian textiles. Persian inscriptions on the gateway and tomb identify the structure as a work commissioned by Emperor Shah Jahan for his wife Mumtaz Mahal and executed by craftsmen under the supervision of the architect Ustad Ahmad Lahori. The author dismisses the Italian hypothesis as a colonial myth unsupported by contemporary Persian sources. He notes that the Mughal court employed European artists mainly for paintings or mechanical devices, not for designing imperial mausoleums. The article also explores the aesthetic symbolism of the Taj, interpreting its garden layout as an evocation of paradise and its luminous white marble as a metaphor for purity. By analysing the fusion of Persian, Indian and Central Asian elements, the author concludes that the Taj represents the culmination of Mughal architectural genius.

AI-assisted summary, not yet checked. Consult the original PDF before citing.

Conclusion

The investigation shows that the Taj Mahal’s design cannot be credited to a European architect; instead it is the product of Mughal imperial patronage and the synthesis of long-established architectural traditions. The monument’s exquisite form and ornamental detail reflect the collaborative work of master craftsmen led by Ustad Ahmad Lahori. Recognising the indigenous and Persianate roots of the Taj Mahal helps dispel myths and appreciate its place in the broader development of Indo-Islamic architecture.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “The art and architecture of the Taj are at once so grand and sublime that o visitor often feels inclined to know who conceived ond wrought such a marvel.”
  • “The Italian theory of the origin of the Taj which hinges upon the only statement of Father Sebastian Manrique (whose information again is second-hand) cannot he maintained agninst the historical evi-dences, direct or indirect, obtained so far.”
  • “Peter Mundy’s definite asser-tion ભ Veroneo was a જભા in Shah Jahan’s service, combined with the inscriptional evidence precludes all possibility of the Italian-theory being correct.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Itinerario, of which chapters 57-67 devoted to an account of the cities of Agra and Lahore and of the Court of the Great Mughals
  2. Chape} of Padre Bantos in Agra by Rev. Father Symphorium in the Transactions of the Archaeological Society of Agva, Jan.-June, 1878
  3. Travels of Peter Mundy in dsic edited by O. Temple, p. 83
  4. Transactions of the Archaeological Society of Agra, 1878, p.
  5. Agre, histerieal and narrative, Syed Muhammad Latif, p, 116

Discussed in this article

People

  • Peter Mundy 5
  • Jeronimo Veroneo
  • Shahjahan 25
  • Syed Muhammad Latif
  • Rev. Hosten
  • Father Sebastian Manrique
  • Ustdd 166
  • Mr. Keene
  • Mr. Smith
  • Austin de Bordeauz

Places

Texts & works

  • Itinerario
  • Tdrikh-i-Tdjmdhal

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Article order

In this issue

Vol. 9 · No. 4
829–834Kalidasa in ChinaLouis Finot835–853Vamana's Theory of Riti and GunaPrakash Chandra Lahiri854–865Krsna and JarasandhaSadashiva L. Katre866–871The Rise of Najib-ud-daulaJadunath Sarkar872–879The Architecture of the Taj and its ArchitectShyam Chand MukherjeeCurrent article880–885The Puranic Traditions - (about earlier homes and migrations of the Indian Aryas)Narayana Tripathi886–897The Origin of the MalpahariasSasanka Sarkar898–911Some Sanskrit Texts on PaintingV. Raghavan912–922Two Types of Subjectivism in Monistic VedantaMakhanlal Mukherji923–929The Date of KarkacaryaG. B. Makoday930–933Literary Reference to SamudraguptaRamesh Chandra Majumdar934–942An almost Contemporary Account of Mahmud's Invasions of IndiaSri Ram Sharma943–947Daspalla Copper-Plate AgreementBinayak Misra948–950King Narasimha of Gaunda and the study of the Mahabhasya in BengalJogendra Chandra Ghosh951–956Early History of the Gahadavala DynastyDhirendra Chandra Ganguly957–966Epigraphic NotesDineshchandra Sircar967–968The Art of Pantomime in KeralaC. S. Srinivasachari969–972The Dasas of the Karnatak CountryS. Hanumantha Rao973–977Hindu Theatre (Part 1)D. R. Mankad978–979AryadevaVidhushekhara Bhattacharya979–980Sankaracarya and DharmakirtiVidhushekhara Bhattacharya981Sankara's Reference to a Buddhist PassageVidhushekhara Bhattacharya981–983A so-called Convention of the Hindu DramaMano Mohan Ghosh984–986Varahamihira and BuzurjmehrAdinath Neminath Upadhye987–988Syntactic Position of the Preposition in ArdhamagadhiAdinath Neminath Upadhye989–991Vainyagupta DvadasadityaRamesh Chandra Majumdar991–994Hindu Theatre (Part 2)V. Raghavan995–1003The Seventh All-India Oriental ConferenceP. C. Bagchi1004–1030ReviewsBatakrishna Ghosh, Edward J. Thomas1031–1039Select Contents of Oriental Journals1041–1042Addendum: Some Sanskrit Texts on PaintingV. Raghavan

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Shyam Chand Mukherjee

All articles →
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Cultural Heritage of Bengal in Relation to Jainism

By Shyam Chand Mukherjee

October - 1997
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Some Reflections on Jainism in Ancient Bengal

By Shyam Chand Mukherjee

April - 1994
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Cultural Heritage of Bengal in Relation to Jainism

By Shyam Chand Mukherjee

July - 1989
The Indian Historical Quarterly

New Light on Sarabha Image

By Shyam Chand Mukherjee

June & September 1960