Skip to content
Browse articles

The Development of Buddhist Art in South India

By Deva Prasad Ghosh

Vol. 3 · No. 2June - 1927pp. 264–272English

Summary

This article surveys the stylistic evolution of Buddhist sculpture in the south of India with particular attention to the celebrated stūpa site of Amarāvati in the Kriṣṇa River valley. It begins by recalling that little survives of the original stūpa apart from carved reliefs and broken railings, yet even the fragments reveal a remarkably sophisticated school of art. The author compares these reliefs with earlier monuments at Bhārhut and Sāñchī, arguing that the Amarāvati artists achieved greater freedom of movement and a more dynamic handling of line: figures seem to glide and sway, and animals are rendered with vigor and precision. The architectural motifs are analysed, including the treatment of trees, which shift from schematic outlines at Bhārhut to more naturalistic forms with differentiated branches and leaves; rocks are depicted as connected bands rather than isolated blocks. The article also considers whether the style owes anything to Hellenistic influence; it concludes that although certain decorative elements might recall foreign prototypes, the Amarāvati school developed largely out of indigenous Indian traditions. Later sections examine the spread of the southern style to other centres such as Nāgārjunakoṇḍa and discuss how narratives from the Buddha’s life were represented in continuous friezes rather than discrete panels. Overall, the article shows how south Indian Buddhist art evolved from the early flat and static compositions of the second century BCE into the flowing and plastic forms of the Śātavāhana period.

AI-assisted summary, not yet checked. Consult the original PDF before citing.

Conclusion

Through a comparative study of relief sculpture, the article demonstrates that Buddhist art in south India developed a distinctive vocabulary of fluid lines and dynamic movement. While drawing on earlier Indian prototypes, the Amarāvati school innovated in the handling of space and form, influencing later monuments across the Deccan.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “The 'sedlptures of Amariivati are to be ascribed 10 two different periods, characterised by different technigues, and several centuries intervene between them.”
  • “The most remarkable feature of those sculptures is an unrestrained sweeping movement.”
  • “Dr, Steila Kramrisch says, “These few instances warrant us to ૦૦1૯1૫૦૦ that the temperamental, emotional or transi: tory side is as significant in tho south, as the abstract, reserved, intellectual or well-caleculated side of the north”

Works cited in this article

  1. M. Foucher
  2. Cambridge History of India, vol, I, p. 631
  3. Burgess, op, વા, ગિ, XI, fig. 1
  4. Dr. Steila Kramrisch
  5. Benoy Chandra Sen

Discussed in this article

People

Texts & works

  • Development of Buddhist Art in South India

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Article order

In this issue

Vol. 3 · No. 2

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Deva Prasad Ghosh

All articles →
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Traces of Jainism in Bengal

By Deva Prasad Ghosh

April - 1984
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Reviews

By Deva Prasad Ghosh

September - 1939
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Kalinga Style of Architecture

By Deva Prasad Ghosh

September - 1939
The Indian Historical Quarterly

A Dated Copper-Plate Grant from Sundarban

By Deva Prasad Ghosh, Benoy Chandra Sen

June - 1934