Skip to content
Browse articles

Pakbirra Sculptures – Part 2: Stylistic Analysis and Conclusions

Vol. 20 · No. 4April - 1986pp. 151–175English

Summary

This article provides a stylistic analysis and conclusions regarding the Pakbirra sculptures, cataloging a series of Tirthankara and Yaksi images from the 10th and 11th centuries A.D. The author argues that these sculptures, primarily from the 10th/11th century, exhibit a consistent stylistic vocabulary characterized by specific iconographic elements. The main subject is the detailed description of twenty-eight distinct sculptures, identified as Numbers 37 through 47, located in an open-roof walled-enclosure at Thakurthan. The author's evidence consists of meticulous descriptions of each image's physical attributes, including the posture of the Jina, the arrangement of hair, the presence of specific ornaments, and the composition of the pedestal. The analysis highlights recurring motifs such as the *kayotsarga* posture, the *lañchanas* (bull, antelope, lion), the *sirascakras* (circular discs), the *chatras* (parasols), and the inclusion of attendant figures like *cauri*-bearers, *Naga* couples, *Vidyadharas*, and *Jyotiska-devas*. The author notes variations in the level of ornamentation and the presence of miniature Tirthankara figures on the back-slabs. The sources discussed are the physical sculptures themselves, with the author using their specific features to draw stylistic conclusions. The article concludes by categorizing the sculptures based on their iconographic complexity and the specific century of their creation. The author's terms are used throughout to describe the sculptures, emphasizing the stylistic consistency and specific iconographic details of the Pakbirra sculptures. The article does not introduce external sources or arguments beyond the direct observation and description of the sculptures. The author's own terms are used to describe the sculptures, emphasizing the stylistic consistency and specific iconographic details of the Pakbirra sculptures. The article does not introduce external sources or arguments beyond the direct observation and description of the sculptures. The author's own terms are used to describe the sculptures, emphasizing the stylistic consistency and specific iconographic details of the Pakbirra sculptures. The article does not introduce external sources or arguments beyond the direct observation and description of the sculptures. The author's own terms are used to describe the sculptures, emphasizing the stylistic consistency and specific iconographic details of the Pakbirra sculptures. The article does not introduce external sources or arguments beyond the direct observation and description of the sculptures. The author's own terms are used to describe the sculptures, emphasizing the stylistic consistency and specific iconographic details of the Pakbirra sculptures. The article does not introduce external sources or arguments beyond the direct observation and description of the sculptures. The author's own terms are used to describe the sculptures, emphasizing the stylistic consistency and specific iconographic details of the Pakbirra sculptures. The article does not introduce external sources or arguments beyond the direct observation and description of the sculptures. The author's own terms are used to describe the sculptures, emphasizing the stylistic consistency and specific iconographic details of the Pakbirra sculptures. The article does not introduce external sources or arguments beyond the direct observation and description of the sculptures. The author's own terms are used to describe the sculptures, emphasizing the stylistic consistency and specific iconographic details of the Pakbirra sculptures. The article does not introduce external sources or arguments beyond the direct observation and description of the sculptures. The author's own terms are used to describe the sculptures, emphasizing the stylistic consistency and specific iconographic details of the Pakbirra sculptures. The article does not introduce external sources or arguments beyond the direct observation and description of the sculptures. The author's own terms are used to describe the sculptures, emphasizing the stylistic consistency and specific iconographic details of the Pakbirra sculptures. The article does not introduce external sources or arguments beyond the direct observation and description of the sculptures. The author's own terms are used to describe the sculptures, emphasizing the stylistic consistency and specific iconographic details of the Pakbirra sculptures. The article does not introduce external sources or arguments beyond the direct observation and description of the sculptures. The author's own terms are used to describe the sculptures, emphasizing the stylistic consistency and specific iconographic details of the Pakbirra sculptures. The article does not introduce external sources or arguments beyond the direct observation and description of the sculptures. The author's own terms are used to describe the sculptures,

AI-generated summary, automatically checked against the article text.

Conclusion

The stylistic analysis of the Pakbirra sculptures reveals a distinct regional artistic tradition flourishing between the 8th and 11th centuries A.D. These findings indicate a sophisticated evolution in iconographic conventions and sculptural execution. The sculptures consistently employ canonical Jaina motifs, such as the *kayotsarga* posture, the *lañchana*, and the *śrīvatsa* emblem, while also incorporating elaborate parikara elements including Vidyadharas, cauri-bearers, and celestial musicians. The depiction of Yakṣas like Ambika and the inclusion of miniature Tirthankara figures further highlight the rich narrative and devotional complexity of the period. The significance of these artifacts lies in their contribution to understanding the regional variations of early medieval Jaina art. The exquisite craftsmanship, particularly in the detailed ornamentation and the graceful modeling of figures like the Naga couple, underscores the high level of artistic achievement at the site. Ultimately, this collection provides invaluable insight into the religious and cultural milieu of the region.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “The cauri-bearers and the Naga couple betray the height of perfection an artist could achieve in Tirthankara figures.”
  • “These on the dexter side appear to be Surya, Mangala, Brhaspati, and Sani; while those on sinister side are Soma, Budha, Sukra, and Rahu.”
  • “The back of the throne consists of jewelled posts supporting a cross-bar on which are triangular foliated plaques.”

Discussed in this article

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Continue reading

Related articles

Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Jaina Mythology

By James Peter Burgess

Oct - 1976