Skip to content
Browse articles

Prahasanas in Sanskrit Literature – A Study of Its History

By S. Ramratnam

Vol. 7 · No. 1-4April - 1978 to January - 1979pp. 64–74English

Summary

Prahasanas, or farces, occupy a distinctive place among the ten recognised genres of Sanskrit drama. This article traces their origin from the vīthi, an earlier dramatic form, and explains that the word prahasana derives from a root meaning “to smile.” Drawing on the Nāṭyaśāstra and later dramaturgical texts, the author notes that prahasanas are divided into two types: the śuddha (pure) and the saṅkīrṇa (mixed), the former featuring holy men and learned characters and the latter including harlots, rogues and servants. The article emphasises that prahasanas ridicule social corruption and decadence, a tendency traceable to Vedic satire. It discusses characteristic features such as simple plots with only two structural segments (the opening and the denouement), absence of heroic sentiment, predominance of humorous speech and the use of percussion instruments during performance. Examining extant examples, including Bhagavadajjukīya, Mattavilāsa and Lāṭakamelaka, the author shows that early works were often concerned with religious hypocrisy, while later compositions expanded the range of social targets. A comparative table summarises how the Nāṭyaśāstra’s classification differs from that of later theorists. The study concludes by surveying scholarly literature on prahasanas and noting their continued influence on regional theatre traditions.

Summary reviewed by a volunteer editor.

Conclusion

The article underscores that prahasanas are more than light entertainment. Through satire and farce they expose moral decline and challenge social pretensions. Understanding their typology and historical development helps contextualise Sanskrit drama’s diversity and illuminates how humour has served as a vehicle for social critique in Indian literary culture.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “Though the varities of the dramas have been classified as ten thus?, they are to be understood only as ten tendencies but not as wat:r-tight and rigid classifications.”
  • “The prahasana itself is a perfected form of vithi which faded out very early.”

Works cited in this article

  1. NatyaSistra
  2. DaSaripaka
  3. Nataka Laksana Ratna Kosa
  4. The Types of Sanskrit Dramas by D.R. Mankad
  5. Sanskrit Drama by A.B. Keith

Discussed in this article

Texts & works

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.