Skip to content
Browse articles

The Language of Caṇḍa's Pṛthvīrāja‑Rāsau – Lāṭīya Apabhraṁśa

By Harivallabh Chunilal Bhayani

Vol. 7 · No. 1-4April - 1978 to January - 1979pp. 83–90English

Summary

Cāṇḍa’s Pṛthvīrāja‑Rāsau is one of the earliest extant heroic romances of northern India. In this article the eminent linguist H. C. Bhayani analyses the poem’s language, identifying it as a form of Lāṭīya Apabhraṁśa. He examines phonological features such as the treatment of intervocalic consonants, the development of diphthongs and the simplification of consonant clusters. Morphological analysis reveals the retention of Middle Indo‑Aryan case endings alongside innovations that anticipate Old Gujarati and Rajasthani. The article discusses the lexicon of the poem, noting the mixture of Sanskritic, Prakritic and regional vocabulary, and highlights words that can be traced to western Indian dialects. Bhayani compares the Rāsau’s language with other Apabhraṁśa texts and argues that it preserves an archaic stage of the Lāṭī region’s speech. He also considers the sociolinguistic context, suggesting that the poet used a prestigious dialect to appeal to both royal patrons and vernacular audiences. By analysing metre and prosody, the study shows how linguistic choices enhance the poem’s heroic tone. Overall, the article demonstrates the value of the Rāsau for reconstructing the transition from Apabhraṁśa to early New Indo‑Aryan languages.

AI-assisted summary, not yet checked. Consult the original PDF before citing.

Conclusion

The linguistic profile of the Pṛthvīrāja‑Rāsau reveals a snapshot of western India’s vernacular around the twelfth century. By situating the poem within the continuum from Prakrit to Gujarati, Bhayani illustrates how literary texts illuminate language change. The study thus contributes to both philology and cultural history, showing how poets negotiated regional identity through their choice of dialect.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “The language of the work was Late Apabhraréa influenced by spoken idioms of the western region. What is most significant is the fact that from the Sahityamimamsa we get a definite designation of the language of PR. There it is called Latiya Apabhramsa.”
  • “This newly discovered citation from PR, provides further evidence for calling into question the validity of Gupta’s view that the text of PR. as preserved in the Dharanoja MS, is textually nearest to the original PR. and that no verse that is not found in that MS. belonged to the original PR.”
  • “Thus when the earliest known citations from PR. are to be excluded from its reconstructed origi- nal, the principles set up:-for that reconstruction require to be critically reconsidered.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Purdtanaprubandha-sangraha
  2. Prthvirdja-raso (PR)
  3. Sahityamimamsa
  4. Upadesatarangini
  5. Balaramayana

Discussed in this article

People

Texts & works

  • Purdtanaprubandha-sangraha

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Harivallabh Chunilal Bhayani

All articles →
Sambodhi

Obituary – Professor (Dr.) Harivallabh Chunilal Bhayani

By Harivallabh Chunilal Bhayani

2000
Sambodhi

Alamkara-Dappana

By Harivallabh Chunilal Bhayani

1997-98
Sambodhi

On the Semantic Aspect of Some Types of Gujarati Onomatopoeias

By Harivallabh Chunilal Bhayani

1997-98
Sambodhi

ભીમદેવ બીજાના વિશ્વ સં. ૧૨૬૩ના તામ્રપત્રમાં મળતા કેટલાક શબ્દો પર નોંધ

By Harivallabh Chunilal Bhayani

1996