Skip to content
Browse articles

On the Text of a Verse in the Bhitari Stone Pillar Inscription of Skandagupta

By Satyavrat Verma

Vol. 12 · No. 1-4April 1983 - January 1984pp. 101–104English

Summary

In this brief note Satyavrat examines a disputed verse from the Bhītari stone pillar inscription of the Gupta ruler Skandagupta. The controversy centres on the reading of the last quarter of verse 7, which has been variously interpreted by epigraphists such as J. F. Fleet and V. C. Pandey. Satyavrat summarises the arguments of previous scholars and points out methodological flaws, including over‑reliance on conjecture and insufficient attention to palaeographical details. He proposes an emended reading based on a fresh inspection of the stone, phonetic considerations and parallel usages in contemporary inscriptions. The author also discusses the historical implications of the corrected text for understanding Skandagupta’s military achievements and administrative titles. By clarifying the inscriptional evidence, the note contributes to the accurate reconstruction of Gupta history.

AI-generated summary, automatically checked against the article text.

Conclusion

The author concludes that careful textual criticism grounded in epigraphic evidence can resolve disputes over ancient inscriptions. His proposed reading not only fits the available traces on the stone but also aligns with Gupta-era idioms, underscoring the need for rigorous methods in historical philology.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “The coiitroveisy sparked off by Verse Seven of The Bhitari Stone Pillai Inscription of the Gupta monarch, Skandagupta, on restoration of possibly the coircct text of its last quarter, has lately assumed interesting, though somewhat dogmatic overtones, with the jumping of some of the stalwarts into the fiuy.”
  • “In our opinion, the last word of the quarter, whicl Fleet had read as SryatSm, holds bey to the correct restoration of th text.”
  • “From the minute details h< has laboriously furnished of the shape and m&tra of each syllable o the third word, there is little doubt that what Fleet had faltermgly rea( as vandak.aja.no , is actually vrtiakathane .”

Works cited in this article

  1. Corpus Inscriptions Indicarum (CII), III, 55-56
  2. VIJ, XVII, 194; XX, 186
  3. VIJ, XVI, Ft I, p. 78
  4. Bhitari Stone Pillar Inscription of Skandagupta (BSPI) C II, op. cit, V. 2-8
  5. Bharati-BhSnam (Dr. K, V, Sdraia Felicitation Volume, Hoshiarpur, 1980), p. 437

Discussed in this article

People

Places

Texts & works

  • Bhitari Stone Pillar Inscription of Skandagupta

Dynasties, sects & groups

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Satyavrat Verma

All articles →
Sambodhi

वाल्मीकि‑रामायण में पर्यायवाची शब्द (Synonyms in Valmiki’s Ramayana)

By Satyavrat Verma

2019
Sambodhi

Nayacandra Siiri : A Literary Prodigy

By Satyavrat Verma

2019
Sambodhi

लिङ्गपुराण का योगदर्शन

By Satyavrat Verma

Dec-18
Sambodhi

Gaddalikapravahah

By Satyavrat Verma

2017