Skip to content
Browse articles

A Note on Sanmukha Karttikeya

By Lalit Kumar

Vol. 12 · No. 1-4April 1983 - January 1984pp. 55–58English

Summary

The article examines the iconography and historical representations of Sanmukha Karttikeya, the six-faced form of the son of Siva and Parvati and commander-in-chief of the gods' army. The author argues that this specific form is a rare phenomenon in northern Indian art and religious history, despite the god's general popularity. The main argument is supported by evidence drawn from various textual sources and surviving sculptures. The text traces the origins of the six-faced depiction to the birth stories found in the Vana-Parvan of the Mahābhārata and the Kumārasambhava of Kālidāsa. The earliest iconographic descriptions are found in the Amśumadbhedāgama, where Sanmukha is described with specific attributes including red garments, a peacock mount, and particular hand-held objects like a cock and a bell. The Samarāṅgaṇasūtradhāra provides further details, prescribing variations in the number of faces and arms, and assigning different forms for worship in towns, cantonments, or villages. Similar iconographic variations are noted in the Agni Purāṇa and the Rūpamandana. Regarding physical evidence, the article notes that the earliest representation of a six-faced deity is found on 2nd-century coins of the Yaudheyas, who were known devotees of Karttikeya. The first sculptural representation of Sanmukha appears on a 4th-century A.D. lintel relief at Pawaya, which shows the god with three visible faces and twelve arms due to the constraints of relief carving. Other post-Gupta examples include a sculpture from Bairat in Rajasthan and a damaged bust in the Lalbhai Dalpatbhai Institute of Indology, Ahmedabad, the latter datable to circa 650 A.D. and showing late Gupta characteristics. The author concludes that these limited representations demonstrate the rarity of the Sanmukha form in northern India. The sources discussed include the Mahābhārata, Kumārasambhava, Amśumadbhedāgama, Samarāṅgaṇasūtradhāra, Agni Purāṇa, Rūpamandana, and various epigraphs. The sculptures are located at Pawaya, Bairat, and Ahmedabad, with the Yaudheya coins representing the earliest material evidence.

AI-generated summary, automatically checked against the article text.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates the significant rarity of the six-faced form of Karttikeya, known as Sanmukha, within northern Indian iconography despite his broader popularity. The text establishes that while literary and early iconographic sources, such as the *Amśumadbhedāgama* and *Skandapurāṇa*, prescribe the Sanmukha form, surviving physical representations remain exceptionally scarce. The few documented sculptures, including the 4th-century Pawaya relief, a post-Gupta piece from Bairat, and a damaged bust from the L.D. Institute, predominantly depict three visible faces due to the constraints of relief carving or severe damage. This discrepancy between textual prescriptions and archaeological evidence suggests that the Sanmukha form was a highly specialized and uncommon representation, particularly during the Gupta period, highlighting a crucial divergence between scriptural authority and actual artistic practice in ancient India.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “The son of Siva and Parvati, the commander-in-chief of gods' army (Sendm na maharri) is known by various names, One of them is Sanmu- kha (six faced); which again refers to circumstantial birth of this god.”
  • “First iconographic reference to anmukha is found in the armottara PurSna* where 'Kumara' is described as Sanmukha Further, he is said to be adorned with three or five' lock arrangement of hair (ikha- ndaka), dressed in red garment, riding a noble peacock”
  • “In Samaraiigatia Siitradhara,* Karttikeya is said to have one or six faces, (Sanmukha) and should always hold spear, the indispensible weapon of the god. He should have two, six or twelve arms, and accordingly different places are assigned for his worship.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Rao, T, A, Gopinatli, Elements of Mi konopof^ Delhi 1968, pp, 417-420
  2. Ibid., p 421-422
  3. Banerji, J,N M The Dmlofmnl of Hindu howpaph), (Calcutta, 1956 p, 364
  4. SmrantiM SilradhttQ (Baroda, 1925), 77, 23-31
  5. Mm //wflgas, p, 26

Discussed in this article

Places

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Lalit Kumar

All articles →
Sambodhi

The Date of the Devendrastava: An Art-Historical Approach

By Lalit Kumar

1992-93
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Another Rare Icon of the Digambara Padmavati

By Lalit Kumar

October - 1988
Sambodhi

A Unique Bodhisattva Head from Mathurā

By Lalit Kumar

1982-1983
Sambodhi

A Note on the Crowned Buddha in Bharat Kala Bhavan

By Lalit Kumar

April 1981 - January 1982