Skip to content
Browse articles

Being and Differance — Radhakrishnan and Derrida

By Manilalbhai V. Baxi

Vol. 161989pp. 108–119English

Summary

This comparative essay explores the philosophical encounter between Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan and the French post‑structuralist Jacques Derrida. The author frames the discussion around Derrida’s concept of différance—the endless deferral of meaning—and Radhakrishnan’s metaphysics of being and spiritual intuition. Although the two thinkers belong to different cultural milieus and intellectual traditions, the article argues that comparing them sheds light on fundamental questions about language, reality and the self. The paper summarises Radhakrishnan’s view that reality is ultimately a unified spiritual presence apprehended through intuition. He contends that conceptual thought and language, while necessary for communication, fragment this unity and thus must be transcended to realise the absolute. By contrast, Derrida posits that meaning arises from the play of differences within language and that the quest for an unmediated presence is illusory. His deconstruction shows that attempts to secure foundational truths are undermined by the inherent instability of signs. The author analyses points of convergence and divergence between the two philosophers. Both recognise the limitations of purely rational discourse and the inadequacy of binary oppositions. However, Radhakrishnan maintains that beyond the realm of language lies an ineffable reality accessible through direct experience, whereas Derrida remains sceptical of any claim to transcend linguistic mediation. The essay notes that Radhakrishnan’s metaphysics is rooted in a lived tradition of yoga and meditation, while Derrida’s critique emerges from literary theory and continental philosophy. The article suggests that a dialogue between their perspectives can be fruitful. Radhakrishnan’s emphasis on intuition invites reflection on forms of knowing neglected in Western philosophy, whereas Derrida’s emphasis on difference cautions against premature claims to absolute knowledge. By juxtaposing these approaches, the author encourages a broader understanding of how different cultures grapple with the relationship between language and reality.

AI-generated summary, automatically checked against the article text.

Conclusion

The conclusion posits that the comparison between Radhakrishnan and Derrida highlights both the promise and the challenges of cross‑cultural philosophy. While Radhakrishnan trusts in the possibility of experiencing a unified reality beyond words, Derrida insists that meaning is always deferred within language. Recognising these differences encourages humility and openness in philosophical inquiry and suggests that dialogue between traditions can deepen our understanding of being and meaning.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “He reconstructed the arguments of the ancient texts and assessed them in relation both to the debates which formed their original context and to modern controversies.”
  • “For Derrida there is nothing outside the 'text' which is itself nothing but a play of differance.”

Works cited in this article

  1. S. Gopal (1989): Radhakrishnan-A biography. Delhi, Oxford.
  2. Magliola R. (1984): Derrida on the mend; Indiana; Purdue Univ. Press.
  3. Coward H. (1989); 'Sankara and Derrida on philosophy of language'. Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research; vol, 6; No. 3 : May-August 1989 (pp-13-21).
  4. Coward H. (1990): 'Derrida and Bhartrhari's Vakyapadia on the origin of language'. Philosophy : East and West vol. 40 No. 1, Jan. 1990 (pp 3-16).
  5. An Idealist View of Life : London; George Allen and Unwin Ltd (p. 343)

Discussed in this article

People

Texts & works

  • Margins of Philosophy
  • Indian Philosophy
  • Vakyapadia

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Manilalbhai V. Baxi

All articles →
Sambodhi

Morality, Authority and Society: The Problem of Dharmapramanya

By Manilalbhai V. Baxi

April 1983 - January 1984
Sambodhi

Freudian Psychoanalysis and Psychodynamics of Yoga

By Manilalbhai V. Baxi

April 1981 - January 1982