Skip to content
Browse articles

Mauryan Art

By Achyuta Kumar Mitra

Vol. 3 · No. 3September - 1927pp. 541–560English

Summary

Mauryan art (c. 322–185 BCE) is characterized by polished stone sculptures, primarily animal figures and columns with flower-shaped capitals, often featuring lions, bulls, or elephants. These works, typically placed on columns, showcased a lustrous finish that declined by the reign of Antialcidas and Heliodorus. The art spread across regions like Delhi, Basarh, and Sanchi, with capitals often depicting seated or standing animals. The style reflected influences from Persian and Hellenistic traditions, evident in structural elements like bell-shaped capitals and smooth shafts, likely adopted from Achaemenid architecture. Hellenistic impacts were also notable, particularly in portrait sculptures and coins resembling Greek designs. While Mauryan art assimilated foreign techniques, it retained originality, as seen in the dynamic realism of lion reliefs and innovative adaptations of Persian column bases. The decline of polish by the late Mauryan period marked a shift in artistic practices, with later unpolished works like the Sanchi Stupa rails indicating evolving trends.

AI-assisted summary, not yet checked. Consult the original PDF before citing.

Conclusion

The distinctive lustrous polish of Mauryan art, emblematic of its imperial grandeur, reflects the dynasty's cultural synthesis and diplomatic ties with Hellenistic traditions, as seen in the fusion of Scopas' dramatic forms and Lysippus' plasticity in portrait sculptures. The geographical distribution of Mauryan columns—spanning Delhi, Basarh, and Sanchi—underscores the empire's expansive influence, while the decline of the polish by the time of Antialcidas and Heliodorus marks a pivotal shift in artistic practices. This document highlights how Mauryan art, rooted in royal patronage, absorbed and adapted foreign aesthetics, leaving a legacy that bridged indigenous and Hellenistic traditions, as evidenced by hybrid coinage, terracotta reliefs, and the enduring structural legacy of Achaemenid monuments.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “Mauryan art 15 represented chiefly in 50106 animal sculptures intended to stand on columns with flower-shaped capitals and in a few Yaksa images, These are all characterised by ત Iustrous polish which went out of use in course of the decadence of this art.”
  • “All the same Mauryan art was not wholly borrowed and has certain touches of originality which an analysis of its forms could not fail to bring out—for which the artistic genius of India may have been responsible”

Works cited in this article

  1. A.S. R., Cunningham, vol. 1, 1862-65, pp. 48-50
  2. Dates of the Votive Inscriptions on the Stupas at Sanchi, Rama Prasad Chanda, p. 14
  3. Carotti, Ancient Art, pp. 208-10
  4. Coins of India, .. 1. Brown, p. 25
  5. Coins, Rapson

Discussed in this article

Places

Dynasties, sects & groups

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Achyuta Kumar Mitra

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

A Further Note on the Origin of the Bell Capital

By Achyuta Kumar Mitra

June - 1934
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Origin of the Bell-Capital

By Achyuta Kumar Mitra

June - 1931
The Indian Historical Quarterly

A Bell-Capital from Bhuvanesvara

By Achyuta Kumar Mitra

December - 1929