Skip to content
Browse articles

Pramana-Naya-Tattvalokalamkara Of Sri Vadideva Suri.

By Harisatya Bhattacharya

Vol. 21 · No. 3, 4, 5March to May - 1925pp. 129–133English

Summary

The *Pramana-Naya-Tattvalokalamkara* by Sri Vadideva Suri, translated by Harisatya Bhattacharya, explores Jain philosophical concepts, particularly the *Samgraha-Naya* (generic perspective) and its fallacies. It distinguishes between *Para-Samgraha* (ultimate essence) and *Apara-Samgraha* (non-ultimate generality). The *Para-Samgraha* focuses on pure being, abstracting particularities, while the *Apara-Samgraha* considers general properties like "thing-hood." The text critiques fallacies in absolute separation of attributes (e.g., existence and consciousness in the soul) and overemphasizing generality while denying modes. It also addresses the *Vyavahara-Naya* (practical perspective), which methodically differentiates ideas, contrasting it with flawed systems like Charvaka’s empirical denial of Jain categorizations. The work emphasizes unity, organized action, and the political salvation of communities, critiquing modern societal fragmentation.

Summary reviewed by a volunteer editor.

Conclusion

This treatise systematically deconstructs fallacious philosophical positions through the lens of Jain epistemology, emphasizing the critical distinction between ultimate and non-ultimate realities. By exposing the errors of Naiyāyika, Vaiśeṣika, Advaita, and Sāṃkhya schools in misapplying concepts of unity and separateness, it advocates for a nuanced understanding of existence that reconciles generic and particular perspectives. The text underscores the necessity of transcending sectarian divisions to achieve political and spiritual progress, positioning unity and organized action as prerequisites for societal advancement. Its rigorous analysis of *samgraha* (generic) and *apar-samgraha* (non-ultimate generic) frameworks offers a path to resolve metaphysical contradictions, fostering fraternal solidarity while preserving doctrinal integrity. The work remains a vital contribution to Jain dialectical traditions, bridging ancient philosophy with contemporary socio-political imperatives.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “The Fallacy with regard to the Non-distinguished consists in a tendency to absolutely separate the two Attributes etc.”
  • “The object of the Samgraha-Naya is Common Essence bereft of inlividual p:culiaritizs,—e.g., Existence, Substantiality etc.”
  • “The Charvaka denies the validity of the above division into Soul etc., which is based on the Pramanas, calling it imaginary and following the way of ordinary men, supports the unreasonable division into four Elements.”

Discussed in this article

People

  • H.L.O. Garret, M.A., LES.
  • Ch: Abdul-Hamid Khan, M.A.
  • Mr. Gopichand Jain, B.A.
  • Sri Vadideva Suri
  • Harisatya Bhattacharya, M,A., B.L.

Texts & works

Dynasties, sects & groups

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Harisatya Bhattacharya

All articles →
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

The Basic Idea of God

By Harisatya Bhattacharya

January - 1999
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Omniscient Beings

By Harisatya Bhattacharya

July - 1990
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Omniscient Beings

By Harisatya Bhattacharya

Jan - 1977
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Omniscient Beings

By Harisatya Bhattacharya

Oct - 1976