Skip to content
Browse articles

On the Interpretation of Some Passages of Harsa‑carita

By Rajendra Chandra Hazra

Vol. 25 · No. 2June - 1949pp. 123–131English
Manuscript Evidence Discussion

Summary

This philological essay tackles difficult passages in Bana’s Harsa‑carita. Beginning with Bana’s ridicule of mediocre poets, likening their verses to a crow mimicking a cuckoo, the author probes how Bana expresses disdain for plagiarism. The central debate concerns the word raga in a passage where commentators have suggested meanings ranging from envy to love; the author argues that raga here should be understood as sensual attachment (vishayasakti), supported by contextual and grammatical analysis. The article also evaluates variant readings, discussing whether the correct compound is ‘pingala‑sru‑gana‑kesara’ or alternatives, and assesses how editors like Cowell and Thomas resolved these issues. By examining the Sanskrit wording, syntactic structure and prior commentaries, the essay clarifies obscure phrases and corrects misinterpretations. In doing so, it illustrates the importance of careful textual criticism for understanding classical literature. The piece ends by urging future editors to consider the suggested emendations and to recognise Bana’s deliberate stylistic choices.

AI-assisted summary, not yet checked. Consult the original PDF before citing.

Conclusion

Through close reading, the author resolves textual puzzles in Bana’s Harsa‑carita, arguing that raga should be translated as sensual attachment and examining variant readings to clarify meaning. The study underscores the value of philological analysis for appreciating classical Sanskrit prose.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “Although I am fully conscious of my own shortcomings, 1 venture (0 give in the following pages my humble suggestions regarding. the text and nterpretation of a few of such passages.”
  • “It is our considered opinion that the word राग, as used 10 the above verse, has to be taken not in the sense of ‘envy’ but 10 that of પ. or *विषयासक्ति 8,”
  • “As ત mater of fact, in finding fauit with ihe bad poets in verses 46, Banabhatta not only puts forth indirectly his own claim to the position of a good and creative poet, but indicates thac फिट wrote the Harsa-carita neither from an undue attachment to his patron Harsavardhana nor બિ the sake of money.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Harsa-carita (ed. P. V. Kane, Bombay, 1918)
  2. Kavyas-prakaia
  3. Sarasvati-kanthibbarang (Bcnares ed., I, 9. 136)

Discussed in this article

Texts & works

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Rajendra Chandra Hazra

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

The Professional Jesters of the Vedic Age

By Rajendra Chandra Hazra

June & Sept. 1962
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Did Harita know the Tantras?

By Rajendra Chandra Hazra

June & September 1960
The Indian Historical Quarterly

A Newly Discovered Work of Bhatta Bhavadeva of Bengal

By Rajendra Chandra Hazra

March - 1956
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Is the Devi-bhagavata the Source of the Deogarh Relief of Nara-Narayana?

By Rajendra Chandra Hazra

December - 1953

Continue reading

Related articles

The Indian Historical Quarterly

Ancient Indian Geography in Banabhatta

By Dileep Kumar Kanjilal

June - 1958