Skip to content
Browse articles

The Queen’s Donation Edict

By Sailendra Nath Mitra

Vol. 7 · No. 3September - 1931pp. 458–463English

Summary

The Queen’s Donation Edict, inscribed on the Allahabad-Kosam pillar, clarifies that it is an edict issued by Emperor Ashoka, not his queen, despite being mislabeled. It begins with the authoritative phrase *Devamampiyasha vacameni*, addressed to the *ravata Mahamatras* (115 Mahamatra Monks), instructing them to re-reckon the gifts of Ashoka’s second queen. The text faces restoration challenges due to damaged letters, particularly in lines 3 and 4, though scholars like Hultzsch and Bihler have attempted reconstructions. A key debate centers on the lacuna in line 4, where Hultzsch proposed the word *pimati* (“request”), but scholars question its grammatical and contextual fit. The edict’s tone and structure suggest a formal directive rather than a petition, aligning with Ashoka’s authoritative style seen in other edicts. Bihler’s alternative proposal to restore the lacuna with a verbal form derived from *gan* (e.g., *gamiyatha*, “reckon ye”) better fits the context and grammatical consistency. The inscription’s peculiar cursive features and stylistic anomalies are noted, with parallels drawn to other Ashokan texts like the Jaugada and Kalsi versions. Despite later scribblings and partial effacement, the core message emphasizes the queen’s gifts being formally recorded under imperial authority.

AI-generated summary, automatically checked against the article text.

Conclusion

The Queen’s Donation Edict clarifies the royal authority behind charitable gifts, emphasizing the emperor’s direct role in redefining donations made by his second queen. By addressing the Mahamatras to recalibrate these gifts under imperial oversight, the edict underscores the centralized control of Asoka’s administration over philanthropic initiatives. Its distinctive linguistic features and structural anomalies, while posing restoration challenges, align it closely with other imperial edicts, reinforcing its authenticity. The document’s significance lies in its implicit assertion of the emperor’s supremacy in religious and administrative matters, as even high-ranking royal women’s acts required imperial validation. This edict thus serves as a critical insight into the hierarchical dynamics of Asoka’s governance and the systematic management of royal benevolence within his empire.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “This edict on the Allahabad-Kosam pillar, which has hitherto been known શક ‘the Queen's Edict’, should more properly be called the Edict ઈ the Queen's Donation, 50 as to guard against 115 being taken as issued by Asoka's queen,”
  • “The edict further shows that the gifts of the second queen were many.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Hultzsch, Inscriptions of Asoka
  2. Lowie's Primitive Society (1921)
  3. J. Ph. Vogel, /RAS
  4. Br3hmi Inscriptions, pr 160
  5. Raghu. x1y, 61

Discussed in this article

People

Places

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Article order

In this issue

Vol. 7 · No. 3

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Sailendra Nath Mitra

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Miscellany – Notes on Aśoka Rescripts

By Sailendra Nath Mitra

September - 1932
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Notes on Asoka Rescripts

By Sailendra Nath Mitra

June - 1932
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Notes on Asoka Rescripts

By Sailendra Nath Mitra

September - 1931
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Notes on Asoka Rescripts

By Sailendra Nath Mitra

March - 1931