Skip to content
Browse articles

Miscellany – A Note on the Bharatavakya

By Chintaharan Chakravarti

Vol. 5 · No. 3September - 1929pp. 549–552English

Summary

In this short piece the author examines the ‘Bharata‑vākya,’ the customary benedictory verse that traditionally concludes Sanskrit plays. He begins by noting that not all dramatic works contain a separate Bharata‑vākya; some extant manuscripts end with the actor’s closing speech (prastāvanā) instead. The article surveys references to the Bharata‑vākya in early treatises and manuscripts, observing that the term does not appear in several old codices of the Nāṭyaśāstra and the play ‘Śakuntalā.’ The author cites examples from works by Bhāsa and Bhavabhūti where the benediction is absent or merged with the prologue. Exploring possible reasons for this variation, the author suggests that the practice of a distinct Bharata‑vākya may have developed gradually. In some plays the final verse performed by the sutradhāra (stage manager) or a member of the dramatic troupe served the purpose of blessing the audience, so a separate benediction became unnecessary. The essay draws on Raghavan’s theories and compares recensions of plays to illustrate how scribes and editors occasionally added or omitted verses. The article concludes by emphasising that more systematic study of manuscript traditions is needed to understand the evolution of this dramatic convention.

AI-assisted summary, not yet checked. Consult the original PDF before citing.

Conclusion

The note concludes that the presence or absence of a distinct Bharata‑vākya in Sanskrit drama depends on historical contingencies rather than rigid prescription. By analysing manuscript evidence, the author shows that early dramatists and copyists handled the concluding benediction flexibly, sometimes incorporating it into the final speech and at other times omitting it altogether. Further philological research on play recensions could clarify how and when the Bharata‑vākya became standardised.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “Thus we do not find it at the end of a manuscript of it dated 1494 8 E.—the oldest known manus- cript of the Bengal recension,®”
  • “The verse entitled Bharata-vakya 15 curiously found to occur after the concluding benedictory verse in the Awvimarata of Bhisa,”

Works cited in this article

  1. A History of Sanskrit Literature
  2. Sanskrit Drama
  3. Notices of Sanskrit Manuscripts, Vol. 11, pt. 1, § 299

Discussed in this article

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Chintaharan Chakravarti

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Some Problems of Sanskrit Poetics (Review)

By Chintaharan Chakravarti

March - 1961
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Studies in the Epics and Puranas (Review)

By Chintaharan Chakravarti

March - 1961
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Reviews – The Mahabharata, Santiparvan

By Chintaharan Chakravarti

June - 1959
The Indian Historical Quarterly

India as Known to Panini

By Chintaharan Chakravarti

March - 1959

Continue reading

Related articles

The Indian Historical Quarterly

Bharatavakya

By Vibhutinatha Jha

March - 1930