Skip to content
Browse articles

Old Brahmi Inscriptions in Udayagiri and Khandagiri Caves: Language and Style.

By B. M. Barua

Vol. 4 · No. 3September - 1928pp. 511–529English

Summary

Surveying a series of early Brahmi inscriptions, this paper analyses their phonetic, morphological and lexical features to shed light on the evolution of Prakrit and the spread of literacy in ancient India. The author collates fourteen inscriptions from sites such as Girnar, Kalsi, Isigili and other rock and pillar edicts, providing updated readings and corrections to previous publications. Particular attention is given to how certain sounds (e.g., s, r, and aspirates) were spelled, the use of avagraha and ligatures, and regional variations in vowel length and consonant clusters. The analysis compares spelling variants like Makhideva/Maghideva and terms such as ‘Ukkala‑vassa‑bhaṭā’ to identify dialectal influences. The article also discusses the formulaic openings and Buddhist precepts found in these inscriptions and points out cases where rhyming plays a role in longer sentences. By carefully examining these epigraphic details, the author argues that the Brahmi inscriptions reflect a variety of spoken dialects rather than a single standard language and that they offer valuable evidence for reconstructing the linguistic landscape of early historic India.

AI-assisted summary, not yet checked. Consult the original PDF before citing.

Conclusion

The author concludes that the Brahmi inscriptions exhibit diverse linguistic features, underscoring the existence of multiple dialects and enriching our understanding of early Indian languages.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “Judged by the sound-system and syntax, the language of the દાંત Brihmi inscriptions is very nearly एक, the language of the Buddhist Tipitaka preserved in Ceylon, Siam and Burma.,”
  • “Broadly speaking, the differences between the language of the old Brihmi inscriptions and Ardha-Magadhi are the differences which exist between Pili and the Jaina Prakrit, and have been specified by Prof.”

Discussed in this article

People

  • Kharavela 29
  • Hathi-Gumpha inscription
  • Yamapura Cave inscription
  • Chota-Hathigumpha inscription
  • Sarpa-gumphi inscription
  • Pivana or Haridas-Gumphd
  • Sarpagumpha-side Cave inscription
  • Vyaghra-Gumpha inscription
  • Jambedvara or Frog Cave inscription
  • Ananta-Gumpha inscriptions
  • Pidamilikakusuma
  • Vaikunthapura Cave inscription
  • Patalapura Cave inscription

Places

  • Udayagiri and Khandagiri Caves

Texts & works

  • Sarya-prajiapti

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by B. M. Barua

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Obituary Notices (Mrs.C. A. F. Rhys Davids)

By B. M. Barua

December - 1943
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Hathigumpha Inscription of Kharavela

By B. M. Barua

September - 1938
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Minor Brahmi Inscriptions in the Udayagiri and Khandagiri Caves

By B. M. Barua

March - 1938
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Reviews

By B. M. Barua, Sushil Kumar De, U. N. Ghoshal, P. C. Bagchi

June - 1937

Continue reading

Related articles

Sambodhi

History and Culture of Gujarat

By Rasesh Jamindar

January 1974