Skip to content
Browse articles

Notes on Dravidian

By L. V. Ramaswami Aiyar

Vol. 4 · No. 3September - 1928pp. 593–600English
Comparative Linguistic Study

Summary

This linguistic study explores several features of the Dravidian languages. In the first section it examines the suffix –ga/–ge found in Tamil, Telugu, Kannada and tribal dialects, arguing that it developed from a demonstrative ending and often functions as a nominalising affix. Examples from Kurukh, Kuvi and Gondi illustrate how the suffix operates in forming nouns and past‑tense verb stems. The author then investigates the feminine personal ending –ce/-ci, tracing its origins and distribution across the Dravidian family. Subsequent sections discuss the development of nasal consonants, vowel harmony and the formation of place names with elements like –ur and –pal. Throughout the article the author compares cognate forms across languages and attempts to reconstruct proto‑Dravidian roots. The study concludes that many morphological features of modern Dravidian languages can be explained by internal developments rather than by borrowing from Indo‑Aryan languages.

AI-assisted summary, not yet checked. Consult the original PDF before citing.

Conclusion

The linguistic study concludes that many distinctive features of Dravidian languages result from internal evolution, highlighting the family’s independence from Indo‑Aryan influence.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “The affix કઠ 15 ૩ very common ending in Dravidian, existing 10 North Dravidian and South Dravidian equally.”
  • “A પહ) close sxamination of the occurrence of the affix and of the modifications of meaning which it induces in the various positions in which it is found as indicated above, would reveal that this affix 15 only an attenuated form of the elementary . Dravidian root kai which has a verbal and noun sense at the same”
  • “the idea of plurality so essential to the language even in its most primitive stages could not have been expressed by a borrowed word, " he native Dravidian root kol {meaning “૦ take ૦1”) can give rise easily to the idea of addition or plurality.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Kittel’s explanation
  2. Caldwell

Discussed in this article

People

  • L. V. RAMASWAMI AIVAR

Places

  • South Dravidian
  • North Dravidian

Texts & works

  • Notes on Dravidian

Dynasties, sects & groups

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by L. V. Ramaswami Aiyar

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

A South Indian (Malayalam) Evaluation of Sanskrit t and d

By L. V. Ramaswami Aiyar

June - 1937
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Dravidic 'Eating' and 'Drinking'

By L. V. Ramaswami Aiyar

June - 1936
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Dravidic "Water"

By L. V. Ramaswami Aiyar

March - 1934
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Notes on Dravidian

By L. V. Ramaswami Aiyar

March - 1931

Continue reading

Related articles

The Indian Historical Quarterly

Notes on Dravidian

By L. V. Ramaswami Aiyar

December - 1929
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Vedica

By Batakrishna Ghosh

September - 1934