Skip to content
Browse articles

The Bharata-vakya

By Mano Mohan Ghosh

Vol. 6 · No. 3September - 1930pp. 485–486English

Summary

This brief article addresses the term ‘bharata‑vakya’ in Sanskrit drama. Earlier scholars debated whether it referred to the concluding benedictory verse of a play, and whether it occurs in Bharata’s Natyashastra. The author points out that the term is absent from the Natyashastra and not quoted by commentators like Raghavabhatta, though the practice of ending a play with a verse is attested. Raghavabhatta’s explanation equates it with the ‘prasasti’, a stanza recited by the sutradhara. The article argues that ‘bharata‑vakya’ is best understood as the final verse spoken by the stage‑manager to summarise the play and bless the audience. This clarifies confusion between the playwright’s own laudatory verse and the concluding verse delivered during performance.

AI-generated summary, automatically checked against the article text.

Conclusion

The debate over the bharata‑vakya stems from conflating terminology. Recognising it as the concluding verse spoken by the sutradhara resolves the issue and illustrates how theatrical conventions evolved after the Natyashastra.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “discussion about the bharafavzkya started by Mr, Chinta- harana Chakravarty and continned by Mr, Vibhutipath Jhal is indeed one having યત interest for the students of the history of ancient Hindu theatre, But any discussion about a thing should be preceded by its definition or description,”
  • “One should know before hand what 15 exactly meant by the Jdhararavikya—a term which has never been used in the Bharata-Nalyasaséra, . This term seems to be oceurring in no old and authentic book on the subject.”
  • “The su¢radidras of ancient India recited the pratasii (or the bharatavakya) where the modern theatres drop their final curtain, And it is clear that this predasti whether it was meant to flatter the deity or the Brahmin or फिट king, feli flat on the ears of the audience who received the bkarataviiya 10 ત spirit not different from that of the members of a modern public meeting when the customery vote હોં thanks 15 offered to the chair.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Sakuntali-titi (Nirpayasigara) 2nd. Edn. p. 253.
  2. Ch. XXI, 105 (Chowkhamba Edn.) and Ch. 0? (Kavyamala Edn.),

Discussed in this article

People

  • Raghavabhatta 4
  • Chinta-harana Chakravarty
  • Vibhutipath Jhal
  • Mohan Ghose
  • Bharafawnuni
  • Dr, Subodh Chandra Mukherjee Sastri

Texts & works

  • Sakuntali-titi
  • Rasidiyare

Dynasties, sects & groups

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Mano Mohan Ghosh

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Varuna : His Identification

By Mano Mohan Ghosh

December - 1959
The Indian Historical Quarterly

On the Origin of the Hindu Drama

By Mano Mohan Ghosh

December - 1955
The Indian Historical Quarterly

The Old-Javanese Ramayana Kakawin

By Mano Mohan Ghosh

September - 1955
The Indian Historical Quarterly

A Brief Catalogue of Sanskrit Manuscripts

By Mano Mohan Ghosh

September - 1955

Continue reading

Related articles

Sambodhi

Review: Bhoja and Haravijaya of Sarvasena by Dr. V. M. Kulkarni

By Narayan M. Kansara

1992-93