A Note on Kicakavadha (reply)
Summary withheld
An automated check found that the earlier summary of this article may not match its text, so it is hidden while it is rewritten. Please read the original PDF below.
An automated check found that the earlier summary of this article may not match its text, so it is hidden while it is rewritten. Please read the original PDF below.
Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.
“There seems to have been a sort of misunderstanding between myself and Dr, 5. K. De, with regard to a review of his edition of the Kicakavadka, And as a result he has contributed his 2770૮૮ on the Kicakavadha to the THQ., (vol. VI, p. 377 f) 18 the following lines I try to clear up the misunderstanding,”
“What Dr. De takes ૩5 corrections may not unlikely be, in cases, nothing but the reader's emendations of additions or 'simple explanatory words.”
“And strict accuracy would demand घाट placing of such words within brackets with a view to draw the atten.ion of scholars to their doubtful character,”
AI guide
Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.
Article order
Inline viewer
Checking source PDF
The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.
Same author
The Indian Historical Quarterly
Vol. 37 · No. 1
The Indian Historical Quarterly
Vol. 37 · No. 1
The Indian Historical Quarterly
Vol. 35 · No. 2
Continue reading
The Indian Historical Quarterly
Vol. 3 · No. 1
The Indian Historical Quarterly
Vol. 5 · No. 4