Skip to content
Browse articles

Origin and Development of the Sattaka

By Chandramouli S. Naikar

Vol. 14February - 1990pp. 13–23English

Summary

Chandramouli S. Naikar’s Origin and Development of the Sattaka traces the lineage of the Saṭṭaka, a secondary form of Indian drama (Uparupaka). Indian dramaturgy categorises plays into ten superior forms dominated by poetry and eighteen secondary forms emphasising mime and dance. The Saṭṭaka belongs to the latter group and likely evolved from popular oral plays; its absence in early written literature does not imply that theatre was absent. Scholars like Adya Rangacharya describe Uparupakas as dance dramas with dialects, low characters and humour. Despite the lack of scripts, evidence suggests that folk performances existed long before classical Sanskrit drama. Naikar synthesises views from Sylvain Lévi, Sten Konow and A. N. Upadhye to argue that vernacular theatre was an important precursor to Sanskrit theatre. The Saṭṭaka’s features include mixed prose and verse, rustic themes and integration of dance and mime. Naikar concludes that the Saṭṭaka represents a bridge between popular folk culture and classical dramaturgy and calls for further research into regional folk dramas.

Summary reviewed by a volunteer editor.

Conclusion

Naikar highlights the Sattaka as a vernacular dance drama that predates Sanskrit theatre. Classified among the Uparupakas, it features dialect, humour and mixed prose and verse. The absence of written scripts indicates the loss of a rich folk tradition rather than a lack of theatre. Understanding the Sattaka helps bridge the gap between popular performance and classical dramaturgy.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “The Indian play, it is almost an accepted matter gradually evolved out of the Popular mime and the crude oral play in the Popular language moving slowly and progressively for centuries, got a well set literaray form.”
  • “Though we do not have concrete evidence of any early written popular plays or a Saltaka type of drama, it does not mean that there were no such plays at all.”
  • ““The term Saftaka jtself is a riddle; variants of spelling like sataka, $adika are known, but they do not improve the sitvation.”

Works cited in this article

  1. The Indian Theatre, National Book Trust, Delhi, 1380, Edn. II, pp. 55-56.
  2. Sylvain Levi, The Theatre of India (Eng. Tr.), Calcutta, 1978, Vol. I, p. 29.
  3. A. F. Rudolf Hoernle, 'Reading from the Bharhut Stupa', Indian Antiquary, Vol. X, 1981, Pp. 257-258
  4. C. Chakravarthy, 'Characteristic features of the Sagtaka form of Drama', Indian Historical Quarterly, 1931, Vol. VII, p. 169
  5. The Theatre of India, (Eng. Tr.) Calcutta, 1978, Vol I, pp. 129-131

Discussed in this article

People

Places

Texts & works

  • Sattaka

Dynasties, sects & groups

  • Upariipakas
  • Patuas

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Article order

In this issue

Vol. 14
1–6A Glimpse of Medical Recipes of the JainasJ. C. Sikdar1–40શાબરભાષ્યગત ભાષાવિચારNarayan M. Kansara1–6चित्तौड़गढ़ - कीर्तिस्तम्भ के 'नानाविषयविषयम्Neelima Agarwal1–12ReviewsV. M. Kulkarni7–11Historical Survey of Vaisesika LiteratureS. D. Jhala7–12महापुराण और भागवत में भरतचरितHarnarayan U. Pandya13–23Origin and Development of the SattakaChandramouli S. NaikarCurrent article13–20विपाकसूत्र और अवदान-शतक का तुलनात्मक अध्ययन पारुल मांकडParul N. Mankad13–20અવલીકનRamesh S. Betai21–26Farewell to the DepartedUmakant Premanand Shah21–53मध्यकालीन गुजराती काम कथानक - एक अध्ययनHasu Yajnik24–36Art of Life as Propounded in Bhagwad‑GitaJayaben R. Betai27–29Review29–37ગુજરાતી ભાષાનું ઐતિહાસિક વ્યાકરણMahendrakumar A. Dave37–40Character of CandrapidaVijay Pandya41–47Tirthas in the Kandula PuranaS. K. Dave41–62પાણિનિય વ્યાકરણમાં લાઘવસિદ્ધિVasantkumar M. Bhatt49–56Campu: An Experiment in Free Style CompositionD. G. Vedia57–64Women Organizations and National Awareness in IndiaUsha Bhatt63–76રોમૅન્ટિસીજમ અને વ્યંગ્યRamesh S. Betai65–75Jain InstitutionsKumarpal Desai76–81Duti-YagaB. N. Shastri77–80જૈન સુરિશન્ય વિતરાગસ્તુતિMadhusudan Dhanki81–89શસ્ત્ર-ચિકિત્સાની પ્રાચીનતાPragnya Thakkar83–90Bhasarvaji’s Definition of Anumana – An ObservationLaxman V. Joshi91–104Upanisadic Influence on Mahayanasutralankara of AsangaYajneshwar S. Shastri91–97વૈકો કિત – વૈદન્યમભજ્જી ભાગિતિAruna K. Patel99–111જૈન દર્શન અને સંસ્કૃત ભાષાAmrut Upadhyay105–107Two Unique Images Of Brahmshanti-YakshaP. C. Parikh109–118Indian Theory of LiteratureHarivallabh Chunilal Bhayani113–121ઈશ્વર' શબ્દ – ઉત્પત્તિ અને વિકાસBharti D. Savan119–128Aesthetic Distancing In Sanskrit DramaB. K. Thakkar123–126મધ્યકાળમાં ગુજરાતનું સંસ્કૃત લલિત સાહિત્યમાં પ્રદાન– એક રૂપરેખાNagin G. Shah127–129પુરાતત્ત્વાચાર્ય મુનિશ્રી જિનવિજયજી : જીવન અને કાર્યRamnik Shah129–144Sumantra – The Rare Expression in Ancient Indian AdministrationSudarshan Kumar Sharma145–152Vedic Numerations and the Genesis of Arabic NumeralsNarayan M. Kansara

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.