Skip to content
Browse articles

Self‑Luminosity of Consciousness in Advaita Vedanta as explained in the Nyayamakaranda

By Rabindra Kumar Panda

Vol. 201996pp. 32–42English
Advaita Vedanta Philosophy

Summary

Rabindra Kumar Pandya examines the Advaita Vedanta doctrine that consciousness is self‑luminous, focusing on Anandabodha Bhattaraka’s twelfth‑century treatise Nyayamakaranda. Anandabodha synthesised earlier Advaita teachings and debated opponents from the Nyaya and Prabhakara schools. The paper outlines the Advaita method of argument: present the opponent’s view, refute it and then state one’s own thesis. Anandabodha argues that cognition reveals itself and its objects; positing a separate ‘knower’ leads to infinite regress. In contrast, Nyaya philosophers treat knowledge as a quality requiring inference, and Prabhakaras accept that knowledge reveals objects but not itself. Anandabodha criticises these positions, asserting that consciousness must be self‑revealing since awareness of cognition presupposes it. He links self‑luminosity to the Advaita metaphysics where the phenomenal world is an illusory superimposition on Brahman. By defending self‑luminosity, Anandabodha affirms the identity of the individual self with the absolute.

AI-generated summary, automatically checked against the article text.

Conclusion

Pandya concludes that the Nyayamakaranda systematically defends the self‑luminous nature of consciousness by refuting Nyaya and Prabhakara objections. Recognising consciousness as self‑revealing upholds the Advaita view that the individual self is identical with Brahman and points toward liberation.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “The Advaitins describe it as self-luminous experience and, like the Upanisadic view, identify it with Brahman or Atman.”
  • “Brahman can never become an object of knowledge. As regards self-luminosity, he is of the view that had Atman not been there, the activities of the mind and senses would have been impossible.”
  • “Therefore, it must be admitted that cognition is self-luminous and also manifests the objects. Just as light dispelling darkness helps the eye sight in its operation and illumines itself and the object without requiring any other light, in the same way the Atman manifests itself and the objects without the need of any intervening object.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Nyayamakaranda with Pramanamala and NyayadIpavali of Anandabodha, ed. Balaram Udasina Mandalika, Chowkhamba Sanskrit Series, Benares, 1907, p. 359.
  2. Sri Dharmarajadhvarindra, Veddntaparibhasd with notes and 'Prakasa' Hindi Commentary, The Vidyabhavan Sanskrit Granthamala 100, The chowkhamba Vidyabhavan, Varanasi-1, 1963, p. 35.
  3. Brahmasutra-Sankarabhasya 1.3.22.
  4. Sahkarabhasya on Brhadaranyaka Upanisad 4.3.7.
  5. Ibid. p. 135.

Discussed in this article

People

Texts & works

  • Nyayamakaranda
  • Pramanamala
  • Veddntaparibhasd
  • Brahmasutra-Sankarabhasya

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Article order

In this issue

Vol. 20
1–11Natyasastra, Sanskrit Drama and Its TheatreRadhavallabh Tripathi12–15Some Notes on the Transmission of the Ayaranga-suttaColette Caillat16–23Middle Indic tuvatta-Herman Tieken24–31Pustimargi Poetry in Gujarati – The Lord of Braj Travelled to Gujarat TwiceMallison32–42Self‑Luminosity of Consciousness in Advaita Vedanta as explained in the NyayamakarandaRabindra Kumar PandaCurrent article43–61'Niravasita' (Panini 2.4.10)M. Srimannarayana Murti62–66Candralekhavijaya Prakarana: A Discovery of an Island of Dramatic ExcellenceVijay Pandya67–72Heretical Conception of Universe and Jain Critique as depicted in the Sutrakrtanga Commentary of SilankaCh. Lalitha73–76Kalinjar Fort: The Time Winner Ancientmost Fort of IndiaDinesh Chandra Bhattacharya77–91Variants from Venisamhara and the Kavyaprakasa of MammataJagruti S. Pandya92–99Alamkara‑DappanaHarivallabh Chunilal Bhayani100–108Heredity and EnvironmentRatanlal Jain109–122સમ્મતાકાર : એક અપ્રસિદ્ધ વૈયાકરણNilanjana S. Shah123–127વડનગરનો સમ્મતિય સંઘારામRatilal N. Mehta, Munindra Vishwa Joshi, Ratilal Satya Bhavsar128–131અમદાવાદની કેટલીક ઉમા-મહેશ્વરની યુગલ પ્રતિમાઓRambhai Thakar Savaliya, Munindra Vishwa Joshi132–133કતિપય ધાતુમય જિન-પ્રતિમાના અભિલેખMadhusudan Dhanki, Lakshmanbhai Bhojak134–144જૈન પુરાણો પર એક દૃષ્ટિપાતKantilal R. Dave145–146ભીમદેવ બીજાના વિશ્વ સં. ૧૨૬૩ના તામ્રપત્રમાં મળતા કેટલાક શબ્દો પર નોંધHarivallabh Chunilal Bhayani147–166રાજસારકૃત પુંડરીક-કુંડરીક-સંધિKalpana Kanubhai Sheth167–190Untitled articleNarayan M. Kansara191–212ReviewsNarayan M. Kansara

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Rabindra Kumar Panda

All articles →
Sambodhi

Some Aspects of Saivism

By Rabindra Kumar Panda

2009
Sambodhi

Editions of Sanskrit Dramas and the Problem of Prakrit

By Rabindra Kumar Panda

2007
Sambodhi

An outline of Jaina Epistemology

By Rabindra Kumar Panda

2005
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Refutation of the Jaina View of Moksa Criticised

By Rabindra Kumar Panda

April - 1993